Space Data Centers Database
Search and compare space data center projects and related orbital computing demonstrations, including developers, technical specifications, suppliers, agreements and milestones. Follow each commitment to its original announcement.
Catalog: 95 projects. 13 proposal / study · 33 development · 13 launched · 20 demonstrated · 4 operating · 9 historical · 3 uncertain. These are project classifications, not spacecraft counts or verified commercial capacity.
37 projects classified as launched, demonstrated or operating: 29 reviewed, 8 with review limits or awaiting review. Each project appears in one classification.
More filters
Linked view: · ARES Shield AI · Suppliers and hosts only.
1–1 of 1 relationship records. Each row is one underlying record, including records linked to several projects. Roles and agreement evidence are separate.
| Project / associated organization | Organization | Role | Component / service scope | Commitment / supporting evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lonestar data centersLonestar Data Holdings | ARES Shield AI | Supplier | Spacecraft protection systems AI-assisted sensing and nonkinetic high-power microwave protection for three Lonestar orbital-server satellites in the initial phase. Wider constellation protection is prospective. Details & project milestonesAI-assisted sensing and nonkinetic high-power microwave protection for three Lonestar orbital-server satellites in the initial phase. Wider constellation protection is prospective. ARES reports TRL 4 after laboratory tests. Orbital deployment and completed deliveries are not established. Wider constellation protection remains prospective. The signature date is undisclosed. Disclosed buyer: Lonestar Data Holdings. Associated organization: Lonestar Data Holdings. More than USD 5,581,180 (PLN 22,000,000). More than USD 5,581,180 (PLN 22 million). Latest issuer disclosure. Lonestar data centers: Demonstration program Next project milestone: First StarVault payload is planned aboard LizzieSat-4 on SpaceX Bandwagon-6, alongside LizzieSat-5, no earlier than April 2027. Timing depends on qualification, integration and launch readiness. This is a project target, not a supplier delivery commitment. Evidence checked 13 Oct 2026. | Contract / order disclosedSource ↗ |
Supplier work coverage by category
Distinct projects with a disclosed supplier or host in each work category. Investors, research participants and other partnership roles are excluded from supplier coverage. Click a count to see the matching projects. Columns overlap; do not add them together.
| Component / service | Contract awarded | Supplier selected | Development agreement | Launch capacity reserved | Preliminary agreement | Partnership | Any supplier | No supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | ||||||||
| ↳ Electrical power system | ||||||||
| ↳ Batteries | ||||||||
| ↳ Solar arrays | ||||||||
| Spacecraft & integration | ||||||||
| ↳ Satellite bus | ||||||||
| ↳ Payload integration | ||||||||
| Compute & storage | ||||||||
| ↳ Storage payload | ||||||||
| ↳ Processors / accelerators | ||||||||
| ↳ Photonic computing components | ||||||||
| Thermal control | ||||||||
| ↳ Radiators / cooling | ||||||||
| Communications | ||||||||
| ↳ Optical links | ||||||||
| Launch | ||||||||
| ↳ Launch capacity | ||||||||
| ↳ Launch integration | ||||||||
| Operations | ||||||||
| ↳ Mission operations | ||||||||
| ↳ Ground stations & ground segment | ||||||||
| ↳ Deployable structures | ||||||||
| ↳ Payload industrial design | ||||||||
| ↳ Flight / payload software | ||||||||
| ↳ Data services | ||||||||
| ↳ Electric propulsion | ||||||||
| ↳ Avionics / integrated electronics | ||||||||
| ↳ In-space manufacturing | ||||||||
| ↳ Spacecraft protection systems | ||||||||
| ↳ Attitude control components | ||||||||
| Sensors & monitoring | ||||||||
| ↳ Radiation sensors | ||||||||
| ↳ Lunar payload delivery | ||||||||
| Commercial services | ||||||||
| ↳ Cloud capacity & advisory | ||||||||
| ↳ Technical training & capability transfer | ||||||||
| Research & feasibility studies |
Technical specifications retain the source’s original units and evidence status. Hardware counts, compute rates and power are not equivalent; launched hardware does not establish demonstrated performance. Supplier counts include suppliers and hosts only, reflect current filters and cover this directory, not the entire market. “No record” means no disclosure captured; it does not mean the work is unawarded. Latest developments use source dates, not routine review or collection dates.