SignalSpore

SPACE DATA CENTERS
SUPPLIER INTELLIGENCE

SPACE COMPUTINGEvidence. Agreements. Progress.
PROJECT COMPARISON

Space Data Centers Database

Search and compare space data center projects and related orbital computing demonstrations, including developers, technical specifications, suppliers, agreements and milestones. Follow each commitment to its original announcement.

Catalog: 98 projects. 13 proposal / study · 35 development · 13 launched · 20 demonstrated · 4 operating · 10 historical · 3 uncertain. These are project classifications, not spacecraft counts or verified commercial capacity.

37 projects classified as launched, demonstrated or operating: 29 reviewed, 8 with review limits or awaiting review. Each project appears in one classification.

Which space data center projects have launched?

PROJECTS & RELATIONSHIPS

Compare the work behind each project.

FinancingSuppliers
1 projects matching0 with supplier records1 no supplier record
More filters

Linked view: Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&D.

1–3 of 3 relationship records. Each row is one underlying record, including records linked to several projects. Roles and agreement evidence are separate.

Projects, organizations, roles, scope, commitment and supporting evidence.
Project / associated organizationOrganizationRoleComponent / service scopeCommitment / supporting evidence
Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&DNebula Compute, Inc.IBMStrategic partnerMemorandum to pursue Red Hat cloud capabilities in orbit, with later reseller authorization described in the SBIR award abstract.

Memorandum to pursue Red Hat cloud capabilities in orbit, with later reseller authorization described in the SBIR award abstract.

Details & project milestones

Memorandum to pursue Red Hat cloud capabilities in orbit, with later reseller authorization described in the SBIR award abstract.

The abstract identifies a 2022 MOU, not an executed orbital service, hardware supply order or launch result. Exact announcement day is undisclosed.

Disclosed buyer: Not disclosed.

Associated organization: Nebula Compute, Inc..

Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&D: Funded Phase II development

Next project milestone: Publish the contracted testing and validation results. The registry lists an award end date of 1 June 2027, not a spacecraft launch date.

This is a project target, not a supplier delivery commitment.

Evidence checked 26 Oct 2026.

Preliminary agreementDisclosure date not suppliedSource ↗
Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&DNebula Compute, Inc.MicrosoftResearch participantJoint R&D to evaluate terrestrial servers in space, with results incorporated into the Nimbus payload design according to the SBIR award abstract.

Joint R&D to evaluate terrestrial servers in space, with results incorporated into the Nimbus payload design according to the SBIR award abstract.

Details & project milestones

Joint R&D to evaluate terrestrial servers in space, with results incorporated into the Nimbus payload design according to the SBIR award abstract.

The official award abstract dates the agreement to August 2021. No exact announcement day, procurement value or deployed cloud service is established.

Disclosed buyer: Not disclosed.

Associated organization: Nebula Compute, Inc..

Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&D: Funded Phase II development

Next project milestone: Publish the contracted testing and validation results. The registry lists an award end date of 1 June 2027, not a spacecraft launch date.

This is a project target, not a supplier delivery commitment.

Evidence checked 26 Oct 2026.

Development agreementDisclosure date not suppliedSource ↗
Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&DUnited States Air ForceNebula Compute, Inc.Research participantCompute & storage · Research & feasibility studies

USAF SBIR Direct-to-Phase II R&D award FA8649-25-P-0445 for Nimbus secure orbital edge computing and representative-environment validation.

Details & project milestones

USAF SBIR Direct-to-Phase II R&D award FA8649-25-P-0445 for Nimbus secure orbital edge computing and representative-environment validation.

The registry identifies a 2025 award with a 29 August 2025 start and 1 June 2027 end. Publication day is unknown. The earlier 2023 AFWERX award remains a separate record. TRL 6 is a development target.

Disclosed buyer: Not disclosed.

Associated organization: United States Air Force.

USD 1,248,207. SBIR registry total award amount for contract FA8649-25-P-0445

Nebula Nimbus Orbital-Computing R&D: Funded Phase II development

Next project milestone: Publish the contracted testing and validation results. The registry lists an award end date of 1 June 2027, not a spacecraft launch date.

This is a project target, not a supplier delivery commitment.

Evidence checked 20 Oct 2026.

Contract awardedDisclosure date not suppliedSource ↗
Supplier work coverage by category

Distinct projects with a disclosed supplier or host in each work category. Investors, research participants and other partnership roles are excluded from supplier coverage. Click a count to see the matching projects. Columns overlap; do not add them together.

Component / serviceContract awardedSupplier selectedDevelopment agreementLaunch capacity reservedPreliminary agreementPartnershipAny supplierNo supplier
Power
↳ Electrical power system
↳ Batteries
↳ Solar arrays
Spacecraft & integration
↳ Satellite bus
↳ Payload integration
Compute & storage
↳ Storage payload
↳ Processors / accelerators
↳ Photonic computing components
Thermal control
↳ Radiators / cooling
Communications
↳ Optical links
Launch
↳ Launch capacity
↳ Launch integration
Operations
↳ Mission operations
↳ Ground stations & ground segment
↳ Deployable structures
↳ Payload industrial design
↳ Flight / payload software
↳ Data services
↳ Electric propulsion
↳ Avionics / integrated electronics
↳ In-space manufacturing
↳ Spacecraft protection systems
↳ Attitude control components
Sensors & monitoring
↳ Radiation sensors
↳ Lunar payload delivery
Commercial services
↳ Cloud capacity & advisory
↳ Technical training & capability transfer
Research & feasibility studies

Technical specifications retain the source’s original units and evidence status. Hardware counts, compute rates and power are not equivalent; launched hardware does not establish demonstrated performance. Supplier counts include suppliers and hosts only, reflect current filters and cover this directory, not the entire market. “No record” means no disclosure captured; it does not mean the work is unawarded. Latest developments use source dates, not routine review or collection dates.