Space Data Centers Database
Search and compare space data center projects and related orbital computing demonstrations, including developers, technical specifications, suppliers, agreements and milestones. Follow each commitment to its original announcement.
Catalog: 98 projects. 13 proposal / study · 35 development · 13 launched · 20 demonstrated · 4 operating · 10 historical · 3 uncertain. These are project classifications, not spacecraft counts or verified commercial capacity.
37 projects classified as launched, demonstrated or operating: 29 reviewed, 8 with review limits or awaiting review. Each project appears in one classification.
More filters
Linked view: EarthTraq multi-spacecraft HPSC testbed.
1–1 of 1 relationship records. Each row is one underlying record, including records linked to several projects. Roles and agreement evidence are separate.
| Project / associated organization | Organization | Role | Component / service scope | Commitment / supporting evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EarthTraq multi-spacecraft HPSC testbedNASA | EarthTraq Corporation | Research participant | NASA lists EarthTraq proposal Z-ENABLE.02-1017 for a multi-spacecraft HPSC testbed in its 2025 SBIR Phase I selection archive. The proposed platform supports AI and DSP experimentation. NASA lists EarthTraq proposal Z-ENABLE.02-1017 for a multi-spacecraft HPSC testbed in its 2025 SBIR Phase I selection archive. The proposed platform supports AI and DSP experimentation. Details & project milestonesNASA lists EarthTraq proposal Z-ENABLE.02-1017 for a multi-spacecraft HPSC testbed in its 2025 SBIR Phase I selection archive. The proposed platform supports AI and DSP experimentation. Records official research selection. Executed contract terms, value, current flight status and processor supplier selection are not established by the abstract. Disclosed buyer: Not disclosed. Associated organization: NASA. EarthTraq multi-spacecraft HPSC testbed: NASA SBIR Phase I selection Next project milestone: Locate official launch and testbed-access results. The early-2026 target in the archived proposal is not proof of launch. This is a project target, not a supplier delivery commitment. Evidence checked 27 Oct 2026. | PartnershipDisclosure date not suppliedSource ↗ |
Supplier work coverage by category
Distinct projects with a disclosed supplier or host in each work category. Investors, research participants and other partnership roles are excluded from supplier coverage. Click a count to see the matching projects. Columns overlap; do not add them together.
| Component / service | Contract awarded | Supplier selected | Development agreement | Launch capacity reserved | Preliminary agreement | Partnership | Any supplier | No supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | ||||||||
| ↳ Electrical power system | ||||||||
| ↳ Batteries | ||||||||
| ↳ Solar arrays | ||||||||
| Spacecraft & integration | ||||||||
| ↳ Satellite bus | ||||||||
| ↳ Payload integration | ||||||||
| Compute & storage | ||||||||
| ↳ Storage payload | ||||||||
| ↳ Processors / accelerators | ||||||||
| ↳ Photonic computing components | ||||||||
| Thermal control | ||||||||
| ↳ Radiators / cooling | ||||||||
| Communications | ||||||||
| ↳ Optical links | ||||||||
| Launch | ||||||||
| ↳ Launch capacity | ||||||||
| ↳ Launch integration | ||||||||
| Operations | ||||||||
| ↳ Mission operations | ||||||||
| ↳ Ground stations & ground segment | ||||||||
| ↳ Deployable structures | ||||||||
| ↳ Payload industrial design | ||||||||
| ↳ Flight / payload software | ||||||||
| ↳ Data services | ||||||||
| ↳ Electric propulsion | ||||||||
| ↳ Avionics / integrated electronics | ||||||||
| ↳ In-space manufacturing | ||||||||
| ↳ Spacecraft protection systems | ||||||||
| ↳ Attitude control components | ||||||||
| Sensors & monitoring | ||||||||
| ↳ Radiation sensors | ||||||||
| ↳ Lunar payload delivery | ||||||||
| Commercial services | ||||||||
| ↳ Cloud capacity & advisory | ||||||||
| ↳ Technical training & capability transfer | ||||||||
| Research & feasibility studies |
Technical specifications retain the source’s original units and evidence status. Hardware counts, compute rates and power are not equivalent; launched hardware does not establish demonstrated performance. Supplier counts include suppliers and hosts only, reflect current filters and cover this directory, not the entire market. “No record” means no disclosure captured; it does not mean the work is unawarded. Latest developments use source dates, not routine review or collection dates.